Create a reference work for vegan food science
The main intent is to create a food and cooking reference that focuses on
plant products. There are thousands of vegan food sources
1 , many of which are unfamiliar and under-used. Fruits, vegetables, grains and seeds are
well-known but seldom explored as the main event of a meal. Here we aim to
discuss thoroughly vegan foods, how to prepare them, and how they fit into the
economy of nutrition that brings us to our shared table.
This site is devoted to the exploration of the vegan diet, what it is, how it
works, and who takes part. Here, we strive to create a serious, referenced, and
reliable source of information about plant-based food. This will help vegans
looking for supporting facts, and help meat-eaters who are interested in
particular information on diet or using an unfamiliar vegetable.
Comparison of plant and non-plant food sources
We will compare and contrast vegan and animal-product diets with a critical
eye. What are the benefits and drawbacks of each lifestyle? How do they impact
people's lives, society, and the environment? What does "home economics" mean
in a vegan household, and compare to standard diets?
Not medical advice
We are not doctors, and do not pretend to dispense medical or nutritional
advice. The best we can do is make note of, and pass along, the findings of the
most qualified experts we can find. While we can repeat what we read, please
keep in mind that only your doctor can know the details of your particular
health needs.
Not food experts
We are not food service or culinary experts of any standing. Our reporting
and findings are from a relatively amateur standpoint. We aim to be earnest and
hopefully rigorous in our pursuit of factual information. We promise to treat
professional opinions with respect, and credit experts fairly no matter the
source. Comments and corrections are welcome: email us at
vfs@netzingers.com .
U.S.-centric focus, Western bias
We live in the United States of America, home of the Standard American
Diet
2
. We grew up on the Eastern seaboard, in a big city, which
makes my food choices particularly biased. There is probably no way we can keep
this from slanting our presentation. We do hope to keep from making purely
factual errors because of our background. Please feel free to point out any
corrections or comments
3
you wish and they will be considered to the best of our ability.
Standard food-science guides of modern Western society - from the humble
farm bulletin to textbooks on nutrition - make meat and animal products part of
the essential food groups. Flesh foods are not a food group, since they are no
more strictly necessary to the human diet than alcohol or refined fats and
sugars. Focusing on animal agriculture misses the potential benefits of plant
foods.
The West takes for granted that
everyone eats meat . This idea was
born in the romantic image of the Hunter/Gatherer of early human civilization.
Now many think that steak is the best possible supper dish, or that every pasta
dish needs a cheese topping. There is no place at the rich modern table for the
cabbage and beans of "peasant food." Such "low quality" fare was banished from
the city in shame as the standard of living rose after the end of World War I.
Scientific literature promoted animal products as "high quality protein" based
on animal studies in the 1930's
4
.
This site is constantly evolving. When we say "science," we mean the process of
increasing our understanding of the world as we find it. Finding the right
answers to match what we see takes time and hard work. A big part of the
scientific process is constantly refining our ideas, so material may appear,
change, or be removed at any time.
What we say is generally taken to be true. While we strive to constantly add
references to the research supporting these statements, this process takes
time. If we find that a statement is not supported, then that statement will be
taken out. These judgements will be based on how good the studies are, and how
much evidence they present.
Food science is a most difficult area of study. You can only use live
subjects, and they are notoriously hard to work with. Changing the diet of a
study group is costly and hard to control, so few large-scale diet researchers
have been able to investigate cause-and-effect. Most food research is limited
to findings of correlation (two or more things are seen to happen together)
rather than findings of cause (x causes y, and the effect y is directly related
to cause x). This means the research does not provide an answer that is always
true
5
.
There are issues of self-interest, economics, and peer pressure that can
change the direction of, or even stop research. These research roadblocks are
difficult to find, and can make people change their minds overnight. This is
called bias, and is a big problem with food science, due to the extremely
personal attachments people have to their food heritage.
Jim Wiegand
Diana Wiegand
1 The number of edible plants is undoubtedly very large. Figuring out the exact number is akin to figuring out the number of plant species on the planet. One survey, the Plants for a Future database [
PFaF] , lists over 7000 species of edible plants. There are 7414 entries in the database, including plants with an edibility rating of zero, which we assume means "inedible," so 7000 is a credible estimate.
2 Rather ironically, the Standard American Diet is neither standard nor a diet. We haven't been able to find a definition of it. Rather, the Standard American Diet is a kind of shorthand for what you might end up with if you stumble into a neighborhood store in a typical U.S. city late one afternoon, looking for something to eat for dinner.
4 Reference needed from the old nutrition textbook.
5 Reference needed - from Marion Nestle?
Last modified date 2010-03-02 07:37. Contact us: